“Most performance artists developed their actions from painting, or to be more precise, from action painting, to which they also remained visually and conceptually bound. My performances differ from other actions performed in the 1960s, for instance in Vienna and California, firstly, through their relation to media and secondly, through their relation to politics. Writing and the typewriter, photography, film and video are media and apparatus that enable a new écriture corporelle, a new body politics that is simultaneously a critique of traditional forms of representation as well as identity politics. The body image realized in my actions and video documents show the body in the age of its constructability via media and gene technology – not as a matter of nature but as a cultural product – for example, in questions of gender. The body is an alphabet; its organs constitute its letters.
In a continuation of Antonin Artaud’s differentiation between bodies without organs and organs without bodies, a body image is formulated prematurely that in fact first becomes theoretically elaborated in the deconstructive philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, for example.
My body actions interpret the body on a horizon of transitional objects (Donald Winnicott) and partial drive. As a partisan of partial drive, unlike classical body artists I did not only search for the emancipation of the body, for instance through the sexual revolution.” (Peter Weibel)